When your AI answers need your terminology, your tone, and your judgment — not a generic assistant's — fine-tuning teaches an open model how your domain talks. Every build starts with an eval harness: your held-out test set, base model vs. tuned model, scored side by side. See proposed pricing →
A walkthrough of an eval harness on a sample support corpus: the same held-out questions scored on the base model and the tuned model, so the improvement — if any — is measured, not claimed. If the tuned model doesn't win honestly, we tell you to skip training.
Sample corpus; your build uses your data and your eval questions.
Proposed pricing — these anchors are proposed, not final. Your fixed quote is confirmed before any work starts.
| Package | What you get | Delivery | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot | LoRA/QLoRA adapter on one open-weight model for one domain corpus, with a base-vs-tuned eval on your held-out set. | 2 weeks | $1,500 |
| Standard | Everything in Pilot, plus training-data curation help, quantization-aware tuning for cheaper inference, and a written eval report. | 4 weeks | $3,500 |
| Scale | Everything in Standard, plus multi-domain training, a re-tuning cadence as your data grows, and deployment into your inference setup. | 6 weeks | $7,500 |
Enough to fill a meaningful held-out test set — typically hundreds to a few thousand quality examples for a LoRA adapter. If your data isn't there yet, we'll say so and tell you what to fix first.
Open-weight models (the Llama family, Mistral, Qwen, and similar) so you own the result. We pick the smallest model that passes your eval — smaller models cost less to run.
Then we say so. If prompting or RAG clears your eval bar for less money, that's what we recommend. The assessment exists to answer this before you spend anything.
You do. The adapter weights and the full training recipe are delivered to you — no lock-in, no license back to us.